Wishful ThinkingWhere would we be?
coopersoul
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit coopersoul's Xanga Site!

Name: Ryan
Country: United States
State: Tennessee
Birthday: 5/15/1982
Gender: Male


Interests: Film, Music, Americana, Books, Hiking, Camping, I'm not a huge sports fan, but i do love college football and basketball. I like to go out and do grown up things.
Expertise: Well i have a degree in History and Political Science and i might as well have degrees in Philosophy and Economics as well. How i'm going to apply this knowledge to the real world, i have no idea.
Occupation: Education/training
Industry: Education/Research


Message: message me
Website: visit my website
AIM: coopersoul82


Member Since: 7/31/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
Blame it on a Simple Twist of Fate
previous - random - next

University of Tennessee Big Orange Ring
previous - random - next

Carson-Newman College
previous - random - next

KnoxBlogs
previous - random - next

Libertarian Ring
previous - random - next

History majors
previous - random - next

! A Discussion of Politics and all things related!
previous - random - next

Two Parties=Zero Choice
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Thursday, November 16, 2006

R.I.P

Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman dies at 94

Long live a genius.


Sunday, November 12, 2006

Borat

Because I live in the U.S. rather than Russia, today I had the opportunity to see Borat, which I highly recommend. In addition to making me laugh so hard I couldn't breathe (the look on former Georgia congressman Bob Barr's face during his brief encounter with Sacha Baron Cohen's Kazakh alter ego is by itself worth the price of admission), it made me sympathize a bit (a teeny-weeny bit) with the Anti-Defamation League's concern that people confronted by the outrageous anti-Semitism of Borat and his compatriots might not get the joke.

During the Running of the Jew, a traditional festival in Cohen's version of Kazakhstan, the townspeople chase a giant papier-mache figure that looks like a Nazi (or Arab) caricature of a Jew down the street. The Jew is followed by the Jewess, who lays a huge Jew egg that the children of the village attack with gusto, smashing it to bits. It's pretty damned funny, but I couldn't help wondering if the rest of the audience at the theater here in Tennessee was laughing at it for the same reasons I was. Another scene that I'm sure upset the ADL, in which Borat and his producer throw dollar bills at cockroaches they think are Jews in disguise, did not trigger the same concern because they're clearly the butt of the joke. A nice touch that most of the audience probably did miss: When the ridiculously anti-Semitic Borat speaks what is ostensibly Kazakh, he is actually speaking Hebrew.

What the ADL misses, I think, is that part of Cohen's talent is to amuse and discomfit his audience at the same time. Sometimes you laugh because you're so uncomfortable. I still have reservations about his mistreatment of perfectly nice people whose patience he tests with Borat's boorish and disgusting behavior, but it produces some undeniably hilarious moments.  Many of his targets, who include misogynists, homophobes, anti-Semites, and anti-Muslim bigots, deserve  to be goaded and mocked, and their comments tend to make you uncomfortable in a different way. 

Whatever your view of Cohen, there's no denying that he's a brave man—brave enough to kiss randomly chosen men on the New York subway (the traditional Kazakh greeting, supposedly); to sing the Kazakh national anthem to the tune of The Star-Spangled Banner (with suspiciously rhyming English lyrics that boast of Kazakhstan's superiority to all countries, especially in the quality of its potassium) at a rodeo; and to inform a group of uptight feminists that a leading Kazakh scientist has demonstrated that women's brains are about the size of a squirrel's. I'm not sure which feat was the most dangerous. 4 stars

 

Currently Listening
Songbird
By Willie Nelson
see related


Thursday, November 09, 2006

Counter spinnin' GOPers

If you need a cheap buzz right now, start trolling the liberal blogs. They're not just delirious about the size of their gains. There's a sense that Karl Rove, built up by reporters (and, let's face it, by John Kerry's campaign skills) as a history-shifting political genius, has been utterly crushed. Plenty of linking to this retrospectively hilarious Fred Barnes fluffer on the Man Who Knew Too Much About Joe Wilson, which ran shortly after 2004.
Even by the cautious reckoning of Rove, President Bush's chief political adviser, Republicans now have both an operational majority in Washington (control of the White House, Senate, and the House of Representatives) and an ideological majority in the country (51 percent popular vote for a center-right president). They also control a majority of governorships, a plurality of state legislatures, and are at rough parity with Democrats in the number of state legislators. Rove says that under Bush a "rolling realignment" favoring Republicans continues, and he's right. So Republican hegemony in America is now expected to last for years, maybe decades.
It's kind of amazing Republicans ever believed this crap. The 2004 Bush victory wouldn't have happened without 1)residual 9/11 angst, 2)enhanced GOP turnout, and 3)Kerry. (It could have happened with a candidate Sharpton too, but I think my point is clear.) And the GOP wouldn't have gained seats in the House and Senate if not for Southern Senate retirements and Texas gerrymandering - Democrats basically broke even outside the South, actually gaining seats in Ilinois and Colorado.

That's not preventing a rush of counter-spin from Republicans who claim this election is a temporary setback to the coming permanent majority. If the Republicans really think this - especially if they re-elect their current floor leaders - they're not going to staunch the party's bleeding in the West, Midwest and Northeast. Take a look at the Senate. In 2008, Republicans will be defending the low-hanging fruit they won in 2002 when the Iraq war buildup boosted the president's popularity everwhere - Minnesota, Oregon, Maine, Colorado. They have to hold New Hampshire, which is still shuddering from the Democratic landslide that nuked two congressman and both Houses of the state legislature on Tuesday. The churning conventional wisdom about this Democratic majority coming in on the backs of "conservative Democrats" is a false promise for Republicans. As I wrote that, Fox News' John Gibson tried to argue that the new Democrats were conservatives in disguise because some of them were "ex-military." Really, if that's the mentality, the Democrats are going to keep making the sale to libertarian-minded voters.
Currently Watching
Arrested Development - Season 3
By Arrested Development
see related


Monday, November 06, 2006

I'm back again!

This long awaited post is a doozy.....how is everyone in Xangaland!?

Elections and Civil Disobedience

Try to suppress your initial, gut reactions and let the following ideas sink in.

We tend to think of exercising power through the application of force or by strong overt action.  Another, perhaps more Eastern, way of seeing power is through withholding something or through denial.  For effective patriotic behavior today we must deny the corrupt political and economic system of what it wants from us - our participation.  Through denial we can remove credibility and legitimacy and open opportunities for fundamental change that no exercise of traditional raw power can achieve.  Populist power is the goal.

What the loose and fragmented progressive movement in this country needs is a broad strategy to actually accomplish something other than talking, writing and complaining.  I propose the application of civil disobedience to fit our times and needs.  We can learn from the pioneering thinking and actions of great revolutionaries. 

From Henry David Thoreau we must learn that we do not have to physically fight the government if we think it no longer gives us a trustworthy representative democracy, but instead not support it in ways that give it legitimacy and empower it to serve the interests of political and economic elites rather than working- and middle-class Americans. 

Mahatma Gandhi said "Civil disobedience is the inherent right of a citizen to be civil, implies discipline, thought, care, attention and sacrifice."  This is asking a lot of Americans that to an incredible extent have become - actually have been conditioned and trained to become - disengaged from civic life and responsibility, and too consumed with materialistic consumption to fully comprehend the many ways their democracy and economic system no longer serve their interests.  Their democracy has let them down, and they have let their democracy down.  It gives little satisfaction to say that the public has gotten the government it deserves.  A great many of us know that we have not gotten the government we deserve.  But what are we to do?

From Dr. Martin Luther King and the civil rights movement we must learn that although great rhetoric is important in building public support, people must take concrete actions to reveal and oppose evil forces in our society.  It seems impractical today, however, to expect large numbers of people to break laws and suffer the consequences of police brutality and imprisonment.  Or to think that doing so is sufficient to overturn our corrupt political system.  Such violent protest is more likely to hasten the path to a police state.

I propose a form of civil disobedience that suit these times and the nature of the political  repressive forces that now reign supreme in America.

On the political front, no restoration of American democracy is possible until we break the stranglehold of the corrupt two-party duopoly.  What I like to call the Democraps and Republicrooks have been irreversibly corrupted by money from corporate and other special interests, creating a MISrepresentative democracy that no longer serves public interests.  By marginalizing third parties the range and quality of political discourse in our nation have been terribly eroded.  Nor has our mainstream media performed its vital function to safeguard our democracy, because like the political system they too have been corrupted by corporate interests. 

It has become rational for many thoughtful people to not vote at all, while many others have become lesser-evil voters out of desperation.  Lesser-evil voting sustains the two-party duopoly and, at best, produces cosmetic change, while not touching underlying root problems.  Only a tiny fraction of the electorate is committed to minor political parties, too few to create any competing party nationally and with very few exceptions even locally. 

My act of progressive civil disobedience is for all Americans to NOT vote in any election for either Democraps or Republicrooks.  You are likely among the many who vehemently hate the Bush regime.  And so proposing that you NOT vote for Democraps this November will at first seem ludicrous.  But with deeper reflection, you just may come to see that for obtaining major political change it would help to NOT vote for Democraps.

The goal is to sharply reduce the already low voter turnout figures in all elections, but especially presidential elections, to such low figures that the government visibly has little legitimacy as a representative democracy that is accountable to the will of the people.  Legitimacy of the American government is rarely discussed, at least here in America.  But it is exactly the loss of legitimacy worldwide that has risen in recent years.  What we need to do is shove the legitimacy of our democracy off the cliff - and by doing so open our political arena to truly bold, new independent thinkers and leaders.  To rescue and restore our currently sick democracy we must first de-legitimize it.

The objective of such non-voting civil disobedience is not to abdicate our responsibility, but take our civic responsibility to a higher level.  We must exercise power by withholding our votes from a system that no longer deserves our votes.  In this way we can demand and receive a host of political and policy reforms that reenergizes and restores our democracy.  Most important are reforms to greatly balance or really offset the power of elected representatives with much greater participatory and direct democracy by we the sovereign people.  Such reforms must also open up the political system to third parties and eliminate the corrupting influence of money from corporate and other special interests. 

The best way to NOT waste your vote is to NOT vote for candidates from both major parties. Stop being enablers of a fraudulent government.

Hundreds of public opinion polls in recent years have supplied all the evidence one could want to demonstrate the terrible state of American democracy, so awful and disgraceful that it is justifiably called delusional, because it no longer is what people think it is.  Yet people keep out the pain of admitting that their democracy is no longer great, even though they have little confidence in politicians and their parties.  The latest stark public appraisal of politicians was the New York Times/CBS poll conducted earlier this month.  Among its findings was that 69 percent of people think that members of congress consider themselves above the law; 70 percent believe that most members of congress do not understand the needs and problems of people like them; and 36 percent believe that Republicrooks in congress are more corrupt than Democraps, 17 percent believe the reverse, and 27 percent think both are equally corrupt - adding up to 80 percent seeing a corrupt congress.  You might expect such public opinion statistics of some blatantly faux foreign democracy, not the United States of America.

Another interesting reality is a statistic determined about the recent primary elections nationwide.  The Center for the Study of the American Electorate at American University found that just 15 percent of eligible voters went to the polls for primary elections.  Just 15 percent!

Some people would be depressed by this figure.  I see it very positively.  Curtis Gans, the director of the study, concluded "People are becoming increasingly disaffected with both parties."  Amen.  But people are more than disaffected.  They are mad as hell.  Yet few see a way out of this national morass.

Our political elites and plutocrats can easily ignore low turnout for primaries.  But contemplate how a really low turnout for general elections would be treated.  Imagine a presidential election with a national turnout of say 20 or 25 percent.  Such low eligible voter turnout would publicly de-legitimize our delusional democracy.  How could any American president that had a majority of something like 15 percent or less of all eligible voters be viewed as legitimate?  Our representative democracy would be seen worldwide as a sham.  Many Americans would conclude "enough is enough."

More people must agree that there is nothing sacred about two-party rule.  Bipartisanship is just a ploy to make the two-party conspiracy more palatable.  Democraps and Republicrooks have a political partnership.  Each needs the other to maintain the optical delusion that we have political choices, and that when one fails the people, the other will come to the rescue.  We cannot vote our way to national renewal as long as we play according to their status quo rules.  Our democracy is choking to death on bipartisan corruption.  Only independent-minded Americans can apply a Heimlich maneuver to save it.

Divided, we empower the plutocracy with our money and our votes. 

United, we can deliver a peaceful, disobedient and populist Second American Revolution by withholding our money and our votes.  We have it in our power to make Thoreau, Gandhi, King and future generations proud of us.

What is true American patriotism today?  Our sick democracy needs dissent through disobedience, not our votes, to become healthy.


Friday, September 22, 2006

Numbers tell it all

2,974= Number of Americans KIA (Killed in Action) in Iraq (as of today).

 

 

2,973= Number of Americans that died on 911.

 

 

Are we better off?



Next 5 >>